I.K.E., on 25 October 2010 - 07:12 PM, said:
False. There are Bond movies back to the 60s. 60s to now....closer to 60 years than 20.
well im not that old lol. i was being conservative. my point still stands. The only things that can compete in length of time in action are The Simpsons and Brett Farve.
You really didnt like Daniel Craig? I see where youre going with the face look part *(see below), but i think he fills the role nicely. Every new bond catches crap when they first start.
and i believe we are still quite on topic.
* Worst actor-role placement in any movie ive seen is Jim Carrey in 23. As much as he wants to, he will never be able to play a serious, suspenseful role. The full effect of the movie was lost on me because i kept waiting for the classic Jim Carey faces, jokes, and speaking via anus.