ie: (imho) when crossing a large open area it is better to send fireteam-a (fireteam = 3-5 people) across the field while fireteam-b covers them rather than hammering the op-force up then sending your guys up. this is because, a: (imho) 4 guys with slow shooting markers still shoot more than one guy with a double t gatlin.
b: if you can do a thing quietly people are less likely to shoot at you.
c: if you have one guy shooting at everything suspicious people are gonna take pot-shots at him (or i would) and (imho) its not worth risking your saw/hammer (or anyone else on your side of the field for that matter)
d: when your finaly crossing (after hammering the op-force) people will take pot shots at you cuz your loud! (or again atleast i was (real event...))
please understand: im not tryin to diss specops (regurdless of how it sounds). i just think this is a problem that needs to be adressed and i dont know how else to take care of it.
edit: i just took the test again, and i got a 79 out of 100. i got a good number of the questions right this time, but the confusing questions still defeated me. seriously some of the spec-ops answers are (imho) dead wrong! i mean... forgive me for being a little blunt, but this problem still hasn't been fixed.
edit continued: Please Spec-Ops, fix this test! it has given me troubles the moment i took it. Also, if you review it alot of the stuf does seem like it was written by someone who was so hyped up on making the test that they forgot their answers lacked common sence and (more than that) maturity...
This post has been edited by weeebeep: 26 September 2007 - 07:28 PM